坨17井试井资料分析与解释

2006年 13卷 第06期
阅读:131
查看详情
Analysis and Interpretation of Well Testing Data of Well Tuo 17
( 1. 中国地质大学, 北京100083; 2. 吉林油田分公司新木采油厂, 吉林松原138000;
3. 吉林油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 吉林松原138000; 4. 吉林石油集团有限责任公司井下作业工程公司, 吉林松原138000)
 1. China University of Geosciences,
Beijing 100083; 2. X inmu Oil Production, Jilin Oilf ield
Company, CNPC, Songyuan 138000, China
双坨子气田坨17井于1998年7月10日完井, 到目前为止共进行了1次不稳定
试井, 1次修正等时试井。利用产能试井、压力恢复试井资料的解释获得了大量信息, 采用双
对数和半对数对该井外边界进行分析, 提出在进行试井解释时, 解释模型选用十分重要, 一定
要结合地质条件和试井曲线形态进行判断。利用该井修正等时试井资料确定真表皮系数为
0, 而压力恢复试井解释的S 为34, 说明该井配产太高紊流损失严重。确定产能试井无阻流量
为108.582 dam3 /d, 用无阻流量的1 /5确定合理产量为21.7 dam3 /d。
TheW ellTuo 17 in Shuang tuozi g as field w as com pleted
on July 10th 1998. So far an unstable w e ll testing and a
m od ified isochrono l testing w ere conduc ted. A great deal o f
inform ation was ob tained by interpretation o f produc tiv ity test
and pressure bu ild-up test data. B ased on doub le- log and
sem -i log analysis, the outer bounda ries of this w e ll are two
paralle l fau lts, wh ich a re co rresponding w ith the geolog ica l
cond itions. It is presented tha t the se lection o f the
interpretation m ode l is ve ry importan t fo r we ll testing
interpretation. A correct judgm ent shou ld be m ade by
comb in ing g eo log ical cond itions and curvem orphology of w ell
testing. The true sk in factor is determ ined to be about 0 by
using mod ified isochrono l testing of this w el,l how eve r, the
interpretation resu lt of pressure build-up test show s tha t the
production quo ta is too high and the turbulent loss is ser ious.
The open flow capac ity of productiv ity test is determ ined to be
108. 582 thousand cubic m eters per day, and the reasonab le
production is dete rm ined to be 21. 7 thousand cub ic m eters
per day by using one fifth of open flow capacity.
不稳定试井;试井解释与分析;稳定试井;确定合理产量;
Unstab le w ell testing, Interpretation and
analysis o f w e ll testing, Stab le w e ll testing, Determ ination o f
reasonab le production.;