论文详情
盐穴储气库无垫底气技术探讨
石油钻采工艺
2020年 42卷 第4期
阅读:83
查看详情
Title
Discussion on the no cushion gas technology of salt-cavern gas storage
作者
杨海军
周冬林
杜玉洁
姜海涛
于青青
张凯峰
Authors
YANG Haijun
ZHOU Donglin
DU Yujie
JIANG Haitao
YU Qingqing
ZHANG Kaifeng
单位
中国石油天然气股份有限公司盐穴储气库技术研究中心
华北石油管理局有限公司江苏储气库分公司
Organization
PetroChina Research Center of Salt-Cavern UGS Technology, Zhenjiang 212000, Jiangsu, China
Jiangsu Gas Storage Branch, PetroChina Huabei Petroleum Administration Co. Ltd., Zhenjiang 212000, Jiangsu, China
摘要
盐穴储气库运行过程中垫底气始终无法采出,增加了储气库工程建设成本,降低了储气库运行经济效益。基于盐穴储气库注气排卤技术经验,提出了盐穴储气库无垫底气技术。从储气库运行方式、腔体利用效率、建设成本、建设地质门槛和腔体长期稳定性等方面,对无垫底气运行和常规运行两种方式进行了对比,并以2个储气库为典型代表,给出了薄盐层和深部盐层利用2种不同技术建库的对比案例。结果表明,无垫底气技术可以大幅度提高盐穴储气库腔体利用效率,显著降低盐穴储气库工程建设成本,降低盐穴储气库建设地质门槛,有利于腔体长期稳定性运行,该研究可为我国盐穴储气库建设带来更好的效益。
Abstract
In the operation process of salt-cavern gas storage, cushion gas can never be recovered, which increases the engineering construction cost of gas storage and decreases its economic benefit. A cushion gas free technology of salt-cavern gas storage was put forward based on the gas injection & brine discharge technologies and experience of salt-cavern gas storage. Then, the cushion gas free operation mode was compared with the conventional operation mode from the aspects of gas storage operation mode, cavity utilization rate, construction cost, construction geological threshold and long-term cavity stability. Finally, taking two gas storages as the typical representatives, storage construction cases in thin salt beds and deep salt beds by means of two different technologies was compared. It is indicated that the cushion gas free technology can greatly increase the cavity utilization rate of salt-cavern gas storage, significantly decline its engineering construction cost, decrease its construction geological threshold and promote the long-term stable operation of cavity. The research results can bring better benefits to the construction of salt-cavern gas storages in China.
关键词:
盐穴储气库;
垫底气;
注采运行;
腔体利用率;
建设成本;
腔体稳定性;
Keywords:
salt-cavern gas storage;
cushion gas;
injection and production;
cavity utilization rate;
construction cost;
cavity stability;
DOI
10.13639/j.odpt.2020.04.022