静校正对比流程与叠加速度修正方法

2013年 52卷 第No. 1期
阅读:86
查看详情
Static correction comparison workflow and stacking velocity modification method
中国石油化工股份有限公司石油物探技术研究院,江苏南京211103
Lin Boxiang,Sinopec Geophysical Research Institute,Nanjing 211103,China
为了找到一种最适合的静校正方法与参数,不同静校正方法和参数计算的静校正量常被用于同一个
地震数据进行测试,并依据叠加剖面质量来判断静校正量的优劣。合理的对比流程对静校正量的客观评
价至关重要。分析了与静校正相关的影响叠加剖面质量的因素,指出除了静校正量外,叠加剖面质量还
与叠加速度关系密切,而叠加速度又是静校正量的函数。给出了一种比较合理的静校正对比流程,其中
采用了与各自静校正量相适应的叠加速度。认为基于另一套静校正量的叠加速度分析结果,不一定适合
应用了当前静校正量的地震数据,叠加结果并不一定能代表当前静校正量的实际效果。分析了静校正量
与叠加速度间的关系,提出了一种利用静校正量差异对叠加速度进行修正的方法并用实例说明了应用效
果。
In order to select most suitable method and parameters to carry out static correction,the statics calculated by
different static correction methods and parameters is often used to the same seismic data,and is judged in terms
of the quality of stacking profiles.Reasonable comparison workflow is very important for objective evaluation on
statics.Therefore,we analyze the factors influencing on the quality of stacking profiles related to static correction
,and point out that the quality of stacking profile also has close relationship with stacking velocity (stacking
velocity is also the function of statics).From this point,we propose more reasonable statics comparison workflow
,which adopts the stacking velocity fitting with its own statics.The analysis result shows that the stacking velocity
based on one set of statics maybe not suitable to the seismic data adopting the current statics,and the stacking
results maybe not represent the actual effect of the current statics.The relationship between statics and stacking
velocity is analyzed.Moreover,a method to modify stacking velocity by the contrast of statics is proposed,and
has been proved its feasibility by the application on actual data.
静校正对比; 流程; 速度分析; 叠加速度; 修正;
static comparison; workflow; velocity analysis; stacking velocity; modification;
10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2013.01.005