论文详情
“双碳”目标下二氧化碳捕集、利用与封存技术及产业化发展路径
石油钻采工艺
2023年 45卷 第6期
阅读:131
查看详情
Title
Carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage technology and industrialization development path under the dual carbon goal
Authors
LI Yang
ZHAO Qingmin
XUE Zhaojie
单位
中国石油化工股份有限公司
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院
Organization
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, Beijing 100728, China
Sinopec Exploration & Production Research Institute, Beijing 100083, China
摘要
碳捕集利用与封存技术(CCUS)是有效减少化石能源燃烧及工业过程碳排放的重要手段,可有效降低碳减排的经济、社会和环境成本,是实现碳中和目标的重要技术支撑。中国CCUS技术发展迅速,已经具备了大规模应用到各行业中的技术可行性,但CCUS大规模部署仍面临诸多问题。为此,系统梳理了碳捕集技术、CO2驱油封存技术、CO2化学转化利用技术发展现状,分析了“双碳”目标(2023年前实现碳达峰、2060年前实现碳中和)下CCUS发展面临的机遇,提出CCUS技术及产业化发展路径和3种主要产业发展模式,着力培育相关产业集群,打造低碳零碳示范基地,助力碳中和目标的实现。
Abstract
Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS)technology is an important means to effectively reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes. It can reduce the economic, social and environmental costs of carbon emission reduction, and is an important technical support for achieving the goal of carbon neutrality. CCUS technologies have developed rapidly and have the technical feasibility of large-scale application in various industries. However, the large-scale deployment of CCUS still faces many problems. To this end, the development of carbon capture technology, CO flooding and storage technology, CO chemical conversion and utilization technology were systematically reviewed, and the opportunities for CCUS development under the dual carbon target (achieve carbon peaking by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060) were analyzed. Finally, the development path of CCUS technologies and industrialization as well as three main industrial development models were proposed. At the same time, it is necessary to carry out the cultivation of relevant industrial clusters and the construction of low-carbon and zero-carbon demonstration bases to help achieve the goal of carbon neutrality.
关键词:
碳中和;
CCUS;
碳排放;
驱油封存;
发展路径;
产业模式;
Keywords:
carbon neutrality;
CCUS;
carbon dioxide emission;
CO flooding and storage;
development path;
industrialization model;
DOI
10.13639/j.odpt.202201052